How employers treat their employees when making decisions about them
I know you might find the title of this article strange for me. I am all about being nice to people and treating people with respect and dignity. I am a very friendly person, and usually have a smile on my face. I try to thank people for what they do, and to compliment them for doing a good job.
So, what is this article about? It’s about how employers treat their employees when they are making decisions about them. There is an old saying that no good deed goes unpunished, and that’s what I want to talk about in this blog article. Although employers frequently think they are doing something nice for their employees, the employees don’t see it the same way.
In the past, I’ve blogged about pregnant employees and issues they encounter at work. Some employers think they are being nice to their pregnant employees by putting them into what they consider to be easier jobs. I have had cases where employers have put pregnant employees on leave so that they can rest and get ready for the baby to arrive. Although both of these actions seem, on the surface, to be nice things to do for an employee, they may be considered to be discriminatory, unless the employee has requested the change.
Likewise, right now with COVID-19, some employers may be considering how individuals who are in the protected age group should be treated. The Age Discrimination in Employment Act covers people age 40 and over. The research regarding COVID-19 indicates that those who are older are at a greater risk of contracting the virus. So, if an employer is considering who should be returned to work, the employer should not immediately rule out employees in the protected age group based on their ages. If the employee, on the other hand, has a concern about returning to work due to the risk, there should be a discussion with the employee about what should happen. Not returning a disabled employee to work due to fear may also be considered to be discriminatory.
Remember that any change to a term, condition or benefit of employment based on a protected status may be considered discrimination. If the employee requests the change, the employer needs to consider the change depending on how other employees are treated in similar situations. Any decisions should be examined to see what the motivating factor(s) for the decision might be. In other words, consider your actions and try to view them with an outsider’s eye.
Being nice to your employees is great. Employees who feel respected and valued perform better than those who feel they are not respected or valued. Just be sure that, when making decisions, you are not basing them on a protected status.
If you have any questions or concerns about making these types of calls, feel free to reach out to me at eeoadvantage@gmail.com or (502) 553-7648.
President at EEO Advantage, LLC
Featured Posts

Bye-Bye American Pie: OFCCP to Slip Beneath the Waves on September 30, 2025

How to Conduct a Pay Equity Audit Without Creating Legal Exposure
Related Posts

The False Claims Act Explained: What Every Federal Contractor Should Know

This article is part of an ongoing legal series designed to provide insight and practical guidance on current and emerging workplace compliance...

outRageous HR: The I‑9 Upgrade You Didn’t Know You Needed

Are you still completing your Form I-9s on paper, manually? Do you have a lack of visibility into the status of new hires’ Form I-9s? Do you have a...

I-9 Documents: What to Do When Employee Verification Looks Questionable

Flawed I-9 documents can compromise years of otherwise sound compliance efforts, opening the door to legal exposure and financial penalties. Federal...