Non-U.S. citizens working abroad may be excluded from OWBPA disclosures
On January 14, 2021, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) issued a formal Opinion Letter clarifying whether non-U.S. citizen employees working for a U.S. company outside of the United State must be included in the disclosure required for compliance with the Older Worker Benefit Protection Act (OWBPA).
History
In 1990, the OWBPA was enacted and amended the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) to impose specific requirements for releases of ADEA claims. The OWBPA states that an employee may not waive any rights afforded to them under the ADEA unless that release is made “knowingly and voluntarily.” The employer must give employees age 40 and older a minimum of 45 days to consider whether to sign the release agreement and seven days to revoke the agreement after it has been signed.
In addition, when an employer offers severance to two or more employees in exchange for an agreement that includes a waiver of claims under the ADEA, they must provide the employee with written information of: (1) any class, unit, or group of individuals covered by such program, any eligibility factors for such program, and any time limits applicable to such programs, and (2) the job titles and ages of all individuals eligible or selected for the program, and the ages of all individuals in the same job classification or organizational unit who are not eligible for the program. Even though EEOC describes the “class, unit, or group” of individuals “eligible or selected for the program” as the “decisional unit”, the regulations failed to clarify who that included.
The EEOC’s Opinion Letter concludes that “employers subject to the requirements of the ADEA are not required to include in OWBPA disclosures employees working outside the United States who are not U.S. citizens because such individuals are not ‘employees’ for purposes of the ADEA.” However, U.S. citizens working internationally and international employees working in the United States for U.S. companies would need to be included in the disclosure. U.S. citizens working outside the United States for non-U.S. companies would not.
Founded in 1998, OutSolve has evolved into a premier compliance-driven HR advisory firm, leveraging deep expertise to simplify complex regulatory landscapes for businesses of all sizes. With a comprehensive suite of solutions encompassing HR compliance, workforce analytics, and risk mitigation consulting, OutSolve empowers organizations to navigate the intricate world of employment regulations with confidence.
Weekly OutLook
Featured Posts
outRageous HR: The Future of HR Compliance is HR Compliance as a Service
From Reactive to Resilient: Why HR Is Moving to HR Compliance as a Service
Related Posts
Why Your I-9 Authorized Representative Training Gap Is a Liability
Do you delegate your verification of Section 2 on Form I-9? If so, you’re not alone. Form I-9 compliance tasks often get delegated, but liability...
Legal Series: Understanding Disparate Treatment Related to EO 14398
This article is part of an ongoing legal series designed to provide insight and practical guidance on current and emerging workplace compliance...
Part 2: The Operational Impact of Intensified I-9 Enforcement
Today’s I-9 enforcement environment is defined by high-frequency enforcement surges and a web of overlapping federal regulations that demand absolute...